The ethical issues of research involving human beings contained in the editorial guidelines of Brazilian medical journals

Conteúdo do artigo principal

Guilherme Malafaia
Aline Sueli de Lima Rodrigues
André Talvani

Resumo

The present study aimed to analyze the ethical aspects contained in the sections “Instructions to authors” of Brazilian medical journals which were highly qualified on the assessment of the Qualis program of Conselho Técnico Científico da Educação Superior (CTC-ES) (Medicine I area - reference year 2007). Moreover, we searched in the journals that present information about the ethical issues involved in research with humans, if these journals inform the authors about how they should confirm to the editors the compliance with ethical issues of their studies. The editorial guidelines of 34 journals (17.6%, B2 score; 35.3% B3 score; 47.1% B4 score) were analyzed. It was observed that only 7 (20.6%) journals do no mention some ethical questions related to research involving human subjects and that 25 (73.5%) journals indicate the need for approval of research by Ethics Committee of the institution where the study was conducted. However, less than half (44.1%) of the journals clearly indicate in their “Instructions to authors” that information about the ethical aspects of research involving human subjects should be cited in the text of the manuscript submitted. Thus, further improvement is still necessary regarding the approach of ethical issues in the editorial guidelines of the Brazilian medical journals analyzed. Researches like this seek to contribute with the discussion about the awareness of editors, so that they mention in the instructions of their journals the principles, rules and ethical standards that must be considered in the research involving human beings.

Detalhes do artigo

Seção
Artigos Originais

Referências

Cohen C. Por que pensar a bioética? Rev Assoc Med Bras. 2008;54(6):471-86.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0104-42302008000600002

Post SG. Introduction. In: Post SG. Encyclopedia of Bioethics. 3rd. ed. New York: Prentice Hall; 2004; p. xi-v.

Neves MCP. Comissões de ética: das bases teóricas a actividade quotidiana. Coimbra: Gráfica Coimbra; 2002.

Filho JMarques. Ética em Pesquisa: dez anos da resolução CNS 196/96. Rev Bras Reumatol. 2007;47(1):2-3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0482-50042007000100002

Albert DM, Liesegang TJ, Schachat AP. Meeting our ethical obligations in medical publishing: responsibilities of editors, authors, and readers of peerreviewed journals. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123(5):684-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archopht.123.5.684

Fontanarosa PB, Flanagin A, DeAngelis CD. Reporting conflicts of interest, financial aspects of research, and role of sponsors in funded studies. JAMA. 2005;294(1):110-1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.294.1.110

Brasil. Ministério da Saúde/Conselho Nacional de Saúde. Resolução 196/96. Diretrizes e Normas Regulamentadoras de Pesquisa envolvendo Seres Humanos. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 1996.

Pellizzon RF, Montero EFS, Población DA, Monteiro E, Castro RCF. Brazilian scientific journals in surgery. III: analysis of the Instructions for authors based on Vancouver uniform requirements. Acta Cir Bras. 2007;22(6):511-8.

Rowan-Legg A, Weijer C, Gao J, Fernandez C. A comparison of journal instructions regarding institutional review board approval and conflict-of-interest disclosure between 1995 and 2005. J Med Ethics. 2009;35(1):74-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jme.2008.024299

Sardenberg T, Müller SS, Pereira HR, De Oliveira RA, Hossne WS. Análise dos aspectos éticos da pesquisa em seres humanos contidos nas Instruções aos Autores de 139 revistas científicas brasileiras. Rev Ass Med Bras. 1999;45(4):295-302. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0104-42301999000400003

Goldenberg S, Población DA, Gomes PO, Soares AL, Ferreira JR, Kafejian AP, et al. Editoração de revistas científicas. Análise das instruções aos autores de 19 revistas brasileiras. Acta Cir Bras. 1995;10(2):55-60.

Dimitri A, Christakis MD, Frederick PR. Publication Ethics: Editors' Perspectives. J Pediatric. 2006;149(1 Suppl):S39-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2006.04.050

Amdur RJ, Biddle C. Institutional review board approval and publication of human research results. JAMA. 1997;277(11):909-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.1997.03540350059034

The Nuremberg Code (1947). BMJ. 1996;313(7070):1448.

World Medical Association: Declaration of Helsinki. Recommendations guiding physicians in biomedical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 1997;277(11):925-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.1997.03540350075038

Zoboli ELCP, Spinetti SR. Comitês de Ética em pesquisa com seres humanos. In: JE Siqueira, Zoboli E, Kipper SJ. Biótica Clínica. São Paulo: Gaia; 2008.

Tenório MCM, Bezerra J, Tassitano RM, Barros MVG. Ética na pesquisa com seres humanos: revisão dos artigos publicados na Rev Paulista de Educação Física (1996-2004). Rev Bras Educ Fís Esp. 2005;19(4):329-35.

International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE). [cited Nov. 20, 2009] Available from: http://www.icmje.org/.

Sardenberg T, Müller SS, Pereira HR, Oliveira RA, Hossne WS. Análise dos aspectos éticos da pesquisa em seres humanos contidos nas instruções aos autores de 38 revistas de ortopedia e traumatologia. Acta Ortop Bras. 2002;10(2):15-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1413-78522002000200002

Olson CM, Jobe KM. Reporting approval by research ethics committees and subjects' consent in human resuscitation research. Resuscitation. 1996;31(3):255-63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0300-9572(95)00928-0

Rennie D, Yank V. Disclosure to the reader of institutional review board approval and informed consent. JAMA. 1997;277(11):922-3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.1997.03540350072037

Matot I, Pizov R, Sprung CL. Evaluation of Institutional Review Board review and informed consent in publications of human research in critical care medicine. Crit Care Med. 1998;26(9):1596-602. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00003246-199809000-00035

Yank V, Rennie D. Reporting of informed consent and ethics committee approval in clinical trials. JAMA. 2002;287(21):2835–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.287.21.2835

Weil E, Nelson RM, Ross LF. Are research ethics standards satisfied in pediatric journal publications? Pediatrics. 2002;110(2 Pt 1):364-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.110.2.364

Atlas AMC. Emerging ethical issues in instructions to authors of high impact biomedical journals. J Med Libr Assoc. 2003;91(4):442-9.

Myles PS, Tan N. Reporting of ethical approval and informed consent in clinical research published in leading anesthesia journals. Anesthesiology. 2003;99(5):1209-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200311000-00030

Spinetti SR. Análise Ética em Artigos Científicos que Envolvam Seres Humanos, no Período de 1990 – 1996. [Dissertação]. Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo (SP), 2001.

Pearn I. Publication: an ethical imperative. BMJ. 1995;310(6990):1313-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.310.6990.1313

Office for Human Research Protections US – Department of Health and Human Services. 2009. International Compilations of Human Research Protection. [cited Nov. 15, 2009] Available from: http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/international/HSPCompilation.pdf.

Thomson Reuters. [cited Aug. 15, 2009] Available from: <http://thomsonreuters.com/>.

Guimarães AJ. A pesquisa médica e biomédica no Brasil. Comparações com o desempenho científico brasileiro e mundial. Ciênc Saúde Coletiva. 2004;9(2):303-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1413-81232004000200009