Authorship characteristics of retracted COVID-19 articles

Main Article Content

Rafaela Carolina da Silva
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9684-0327
Hadiseh Heidari
Amanda Mendes da Silva
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1112-2092

Abstract

Following the explosion of publications about COVID-19, some of these articles were retracted. These articles are potentially dangerous to public health as they can mislead about the nature of the virus. The growth and sensitive nature of retracted papers led to bibliometrics studies on them, although few, which focused more on the level of documents. This study, instead, examines the characteristics of the authors of these articles. 54 retracted COVID-19 articles that fit our study’s criteria were identified. The results revealed that 32% of these authors were MD, and about one-fifth of them had a past history of publishing retracted articles. The average number of authors per article was 6. Also, according to their profile in the Scopus, the mean number of documents, citations and their H-index were 61, 3159 and 12, respectively. Women also appeared in one-third of the articles as first and last authors. Continued research about retracted COVID-19 articles can continue to help prevent the further dissemination of questionable research findings.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Silva, R. C. da, Heidari, H., & Silva, A. M. da. (2021). Authorship characteristics of retracted COVID-19 articles. ABCS Health Sciences, 46, e021104. https://doi.org/10.7322/abcshs.2021207.1924
Section
Letters to the Editor

References

1. Song P, Karako T. COVID-19: Real-time dissemination of scientific information to fight a public health emergency of international concern. Biosci Trends. 2020;14(1):1-2. https://doi.org/10.5582/bst.2020.01056

2. Mansourzadeh MJ, Shamsi A. Concerns About Research Ethics in COVID-19 Publications. Asia Pac J Public Health. 2020;32(8):503-4. https://doi.org/10.1177/1010539520956439

3. Cortegiani A, Catalisano G, Ippolito M, Giarratano A, Absalom AR, Einav S. Retracted papers on SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19. Br J Anaesth. 2021;126(4):e155-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2021.01.008

4. Soltani P, Patini R. Retracted COVID-19 articles: a side-effect of the hot race to publication. Scientometrics. 2020;1-4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03661-9

5. Homolak J, Kodvanj I, Virag D. Preliminary analysis of COVID-19 academic information patterns: a call for open science in the times of closed borders. Scientometrics. 2020;124:2687-2701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03587-2