Contribuições de testes de tempo de reação para avaliações do comportamento motor e da saúde: software E-Prime®
Conteúdo do artigo principal
Resumo
Este estudo analisou a produção científica relacionada ao uso de softwares de tempo de reação (TR), identificando o mais utilizado e descrevendo a temática dos estudos que fizeram uso deste software, a partir de artigos publicados na base de dados ScienceDirect (de 2001 até 2013), por ser abrangente e cobrir as principais áreas de interesse no uso deste tipo de software. A partir das palavras “reaction time” e “computer ou software”, identificou-se o software E-Prime® como o mais utilizado, totalizando 11 artigos que foram selecionados para esta pesquisa. Os itens investigados foram: periódico, objetivo do estudo, amostra, área de aplicação ou especialidade, acessório utilizado para resposta, tipo de TR, descrição da tarefa e resultados. O periódico Appetite publicou dois artigos, as demais publicações ocorreram em periódicos distintos. Predominaram pesquisas com adultos saudáveis (n=5), com média de 57,6 participantes. Para registro da resposta, foi utilizado um acessório externo que acompanha o software. Quanto ao tema, foram identificados e apresentados resultados sobre análises da coordenação e planos motores (n=2), análises de transtornos relacionados ao uso de substâncias (n=2), transtornos da visão (n=1), análises no comportamento alimentar (n=2), o efeito da motivação sobre o desempenho no TR (n=1) e os transtornos da fala e da linguagem (n=2), além da avaliação dos distúrbios da atenção em Parkinsonianos (n=1). Os resultados demonstram a diversidade de aplicabilidade de estudos com tarefas de TR com o uso de apenas um software e a forte relação entre TR e medidas de saúde física e cognitiva.
Downloads
Detalhes do artigo
Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:
- Autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons CC BY que permite o compartilhamento e adaptação do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
- Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
Referências
Cinaz B, Vogt C, Arnrich B, Troster G. A wearable user interface for measuring reaction time. In: Keyson DV, Maher ML, Streitz N, Cheok A, Augusto JC, Wichert R, et al. Ambient intelligence. Berlim: Springer; 2011. p. 41-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25167-2_5
Cinaz B, Vogt C, Arnrich B, Troster G. Implementation and evaluation of wearable reaction time tests. Pervasive Mobile Computing. 2012;8(6):813-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmcj.2012.06.006
Erickson GB, Citek K, Cove M, Wilczek J, Linster C, Bjarnason B, et al. Reliability of a computer-based system for measuring visual performance skills. Optometry. 2011;82(9):528-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.optm.2011.01.012
Stahl C. Software for generating psychological experiments. Exp Psychol. 2006;53(3):218-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1618- 3169.53.3.218
Wild K, Howieson D, Webbe F, Seelye A, Kaye J. Status of computerized cognitive testing in aging: a systematic review. Alzheimers Dement. 2008;4(6):428-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. jalz.2008.07.003
Ozyemisci-Taskiran O, Gunendi Z, Bolukbasi N, Beyazova M. The effect of a single session submaximal aerobic exercise on premotor fraction of reaction time: an electromyographic study. Clin Biomech. 2008;23(2):231-5. http://dx.doi.org/10. 1016/j.clinbiomech.2007.08.027.
Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche PC, Ioannidis JPA, et al. The prisma statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ. 2009;339:b2700. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2700
Sampaio RF, Mancini M. Estudos de revisão sistemática: um guia para síntese criteriosa da evidência científica. Rev Bras Fisioter. 2007;11(1):83-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1413- 35552007000100013
Hartfield KN, Conture EG. Effects of perceptual and conceptual similarity in lexical priming of young children who stutter: preliminary findings. J Fluency Disord. 2006;31(4):303-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfludis.2006.08.002
Eckner JT, Chandran S, Richardson JK. Investigating the role of feedback and motivation in clinical reaction time assessment. PMR. 2011;3(12):1092-97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmrj.2011.04.022
Forestell CA, Lau P, Gyurovski II, Dickter CL, Haque SS. Attentional biases to foods: the effects of caloric content and cognitive restraint. Appetite. 2012;59(3):748-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2012.07.006
van Holst RJ, Lemmens JS, Valkenburg PM, Peter J, Veltman DJ, Goudriaan AE. Attentional bias and disinhibition toward gaming cues are related to problem gaming in male adolescents. J Adolesc Health. 2012;50(6):541-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.07.006
Ehrman RN, Robbins SJ, Bromwell MA, Lankford ME, Monterosso JR, O’Brien CP. Comparing attentional bias to smoking cues in current smokers, former smokers, and non-smokers using a dot-probe task. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2002;67(2):185-91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0376-8716(02)00065-0
Makris S, Hadar AA, Yarrow K. Viewing objects and planning actions: on the potentiation of grasping behaviours by visual objects. Brain Cogn. 2011;77(2):257-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2011.08.002
Cavézian C, Gaudry I, Perez C, Coubard O, Doucet G, Peyrin C, et al. Specific impairments in visual processing following lesion side in hemianopic patients. Cortex. 2010;46(9):1123-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2009.08.013
Finlayson G, King N, Blundell J. The role of implicit wanting in relation to explicit liking and wanting for food: implications for appetite control. Appetite. 2008;50(1):120-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2007.06.007
Wilson PH, Maruff P, Lum J. Procedural learning in children with developmental coordination disorder. Hum Mov Sci. 2003;22(4- 5):515-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2003.09.007
Dujardin K, Tard C, Duhamel A, Delval A, Moreau C, Devos D, et al. The pattern of attentional deficits in parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2013;19(3):300-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.parkreldis.2012.11.001
Kelly DD, Murphy BA, Backhouse DP. Use of a mental rotation reaction time paradigm to measure the effects of upper cervical adjustments on cortical processing: a pilot study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2000;23(4):246-51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mmt.2000.106099
Zajdel R, Nowak D. Simple and complex reaction time measurement a preliminary evaluation of new approach and diagnostic tool. Comput Biol Med. 2007;37(12):1724-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2007.04.008
Kornspan AS. Applied research E.W. Scripture and the Yale Psychology Laboratory: studies related to athletes and physical activity. Sport Psychol. 2007;21(2):152-69.
Silverman IW. Sex differences in simple visual reaction time: a historical meta-analysis. Sex Roles. 2006;54(1-2):57-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11199-006-8869-6
Silverman IW. Simple reaction time: it is not what it used to be. Am J Psychol. 2010;123(1):39-50.
Deary IJ, Liewald D, Nissan J. A free, easy-to-use, computer-based simple and four-choice reaction time programme: the deary-liewald reaction time task. Behav Res Methods. 2011;43(1):258-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-010-0024-1
Li X, Liang Z, Kleiner M, Lu Z-L. Rtbox: a device for highly accurate response time measurements. Behav Res Methods. 2010;42(1):212-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BRM.42.1.212
Ohyanagi T, Sengoku Y. A solution for measuring accurate reaction time to visual stimuli realized with a programmable microcontroller. Behav Res Methods. 2010;42(1):242-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BRM.42.1.242
Neath I, Earle A, Hallett D, Surprenant AM. Response time accuracy in apple macintosh computers. Behav Res Methods. 2011;43(2):353-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0069-9
Spruyt A, Clarysse J, Vansteenwegen D, Baeyens F, Hermans D. Affect 4.0 a free software package for implementing psychological and psychophysiological experiments. Exp Psychol. 2010;57(1):36-5. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1027/1618-3169/a000005
Cernich AN, Brennana DM, Barker LM, Bleiberg J. Sources of error in computerized neuropsychological assessment. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2007;22(Suppl 1):39-48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acn.2006.10.004
Johnson KN, Conture EG, Walden TA. Efficacy of attention regulation in preschool-age children who stutter: a preliminary investigation. J Commun Disord. 2012;45(4):263-78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2012.04.001
Garrett DD, MacDonald SWS, Craik FIM. Intraindividual reaction time variability is malleable: feedback- and education-related reductions in variability with age. Front Hum Neurosci. 2012;6:101. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.201200101
Havermans RC, Giesen J, Houben K, Jansen A. Weight, gender, and snack appeal. Eat Behav. 2011;12(2):126-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eatbeh.2011.01.010
Poggel DA, Treutwein B, Strasburger H. Time will tell: deficits of temporal information processing in patients with visual field loss. Brain Res. 2011;1368:196-207. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2010.10.065
Wolffsohn JS, Bhogal G, Shah S. Effect of uncorrected astigmatism on vision. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37(3):454-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.09.022
Suzuki T, Takagi M, Sugawara K. Affordance effects in grasping actions for graspable objects: electromyographic reaction time study. Percept Mot Skills. 2012;115(3):881-90. http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/26.22.24.PMS.115.6.881-890
Ranganathan R, Lee MH, Brown AJ, Newell KM. Grasping possibilities for action: influence of object function and action capabilities. Hum Mov Sci. 2011;30(6):1102-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2010.11.012
Smits-Bandstra S. Methodological considerations in the measurement of reaction time in persons who stutter. J Fluency Disord. 2010;35(1):19-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfludis.2009.12.002
Gabriel A, Maillart C, Stefaniak N, Lejeune C, Desmottes L, Meulemans T. Procedural learning in specific language impairment: effects of sequence complexity. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2013;19(3):264-71. http://dx.doi.org/10. 1017/ S1355617712001270
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; Prisma Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the Prisma statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(4):264-9.dx.doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135