Pain perception and satisfaction of postpartum women: a comparative study after vaginal and caesarean birth in Aracaju public hospitals
Main Article Content
Abstract
Introduction: In addition to the quality of care, physical structure and access to health services, a humanized care during birth process should reflect on the women’s experience of pain and satisfaction. Objective: To compare the satisfaction and perception of pain experienced by women during vaginal and cesarean delivery processes. Methods: Descriptive cross-sectional study involving women in the immediate postpartum period. The modified “Experience and Satisfaction with Childbirth Questionnaire” (“Questionário de Experiência e Satisfação com o Parto” – QESP), the short version of “McGill pain questionnaire” and the “female body representation scheme” were used. Results: 150 postpartum women were interviewed. After cesarean section demonstrated more satisfaction regarding the way the labor (LB) was carried out (p=0.01) and less satisfaction with pain in the postpartum period (PP) (p=0.04). Those submitted to vaginal delivery were more satisfied with their PP (p=0.02) and less satisfied with the intensity of pain during LB (p=0.03) and at birth (B) (p=0.01). The pain described during LB and B were “acute” and “cruel-punitive”. In relation to PP, pain in the lower belly was more often reported after cesarean sections. Pain intensity during LB was significantly higher in vaginal labor (7,30 (±2,82) versus 5,86 (±3,51), (p=0,007). Conclusion: The perform cesarean sections were more satisfied with the way LB was carried out and less satisfied in relation to pain in the PP. Women who underwent vaginal labor were more satisfied with the PP and less satisfied with the intensity of pain during LB and at B.
Downloads
Article Details
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) that allows others to share and adapt the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.References
Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Pré-natal e puerpério: atenção qualificada e humanizada. Manual técnico. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2006.
Serruya SJ, Ceccati JG, Lago TG. O Programa de humanização no pré-natal e nascimento do Ministério da Saúde no Brasil: resultados iniciais. Cad Saúde Pública. 2004;20(5):1281-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311X2004000500022
Fernandes CE. Três percepções sobre gestação e puerpério. ABCS Health Sci. 2015;40(2):60-1. http://dx.doi.org/10.7322/abcshs.v40i2.731
Rodrigues AV, Siqueira AAF. Sobre as dores e temores do parto: dimensões de uma escuta. Rev Bras Saúde Mater Infant. 2008;8(2):179-86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1519-38292008000200005
D’orsi E, Brüggemann OM, Diniz CSG, Aguiar JM, Gusman CR, Torres JA, et al. Desigualdades sociais e satisfação das mulheres com o atendimento ao parto no Brasil: estudo nacional de base hospitalar. Cad Saúde Pública. 2014;30(Suppl.1):S154-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00087813
Pereira RR, Franco SC, Baldin N. Representações sociais e decisões das gestantes sobre a parturição: protagonismo das mulheres. Saúde Soc. 2011;20(3):579-89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0104-12902011000300005
Gama AS, Giffin KM, Angulo-Tuesta A, Barbosa GP, D’orsi E. Representações e experiências das mulheres sobre a assistência ao parto vaginal e cesárea em maternidades pública e privada. Cad Saúde Pública. 2009;25(11):2480-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311X2009001100017
Velho MB, Santos EKA, Brüggemann OM, Camargo BV. Vivência do parto normal ou cesáreo: revisão integrativa sobre a percepção de mulheres. Texto Contexto Enferm. 2012;21(2):458-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0104-07072012000200026
Vieira SM, Bock LF, Zocche DA, Pessota CU. Percepção das puérperas sobre a assistência prestada pela equipe de saúde no pré-natal. Texto Contexto Enferm. 2011;20(spe):255-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0104-07072011000500032
Souza L, Pitangui ACR, Gomes FA, Nakano AMS, Ferreira CHJ. Mensuração e características de dor após cesárea e sua relação com limitação de atividades. Acta Paul Enferm. 2009;22(6):741-47.
Beleza ACS, Ferreira CHJ, Souza L, Nakano AMS. Mensuração e caracterização da dor após episiotomia e sua relação com a limitação de atividades. Rev Bras Enferm. 2012;65(2):264-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-71672012000200010
Capogna G, Camorcia M, Stirparo M, Valentini G, Grassiano A, Farcomeni A. Multidimensional evaluation of pain during early and late labor: a comparison of nulliparous and multiparous women. Inter J Obstet Anest. 2010;19(2):167-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijoa.2009.05.013
Santana LS, Gallo RBS, Ferreira CHJ, Quintana SM, Marcolin AC. Pain location during early active labor stage. Rev Dor. 2013;14(3):184-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1806-00132013000300006
Domingues RMSM, Dias MAB, Nakamura-Pereira M, Torres JA, d’Orsi E, Pereira APE, et al. Processo de decisão pelo tipo de parto no Brasil: da preferência inicial das mulheres à via de parto final. Cad Saúde Pública. 2014;30(Suppl. 1):S101-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00105113
Costa R, Figueiredo B, Pacheco A, Pais A. Parto: expectativas, experiências, dor e satisfação. Psicol Saúde Doenças. 2003:4(1):47-67.
Gurgel RQ, Nery AMDG, Almeida MLD, Oliveira ERR, Lima DFD, Bettiol H, et al. Características das gestações, partos e recém nascidos da região metropolitana de Aracaju, Sergipe, Brasil. Rev Bras Saúde Matern Infant. 2009;9(2):167-77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1519-38292009000200006
Menezes Costa LC, Maher CG, Mcauley JH, Hancock MJ, Melo Oliveira W, Azevedo DC, et al. The Brazilian-Portuguese versions of the McGill Pain Questionnaire were reproducible, valid, and responsive in patients with musculoskeletal pain. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(8):903-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinep.2010.12.009
Luz NF, Assis TR, Rezende FR. Puérperas adolescentes: percepções relacionadas ao pré-natal e ao parto. ABCS Health Sci. 2015;40(2):80-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.7322/abcshs.v40i2.735